by 
We like to ignore info on nutrition and health. We want to be aware of latest in nutrition, but we wish to accomplish only what’s convenient for us. As well as in each day and age when nutrition studies flip flop in one position to a different, you can select what nutrition information you want to follow.
Tufts University recently released details about nutrition debunking the junk advice out there. The “10 Warning flags of Junk Science” is definitely an initiative of the Food and Nutrition Science Alliance, that is a partnership of professional nutrition science associations including the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American College of Nutrition, and the American Society for Nutrition. Let’s see just what advice the 10 Warning flags of Junk Science has for those thirsty for nutrition information.
The first bit of advice given is to ignore any product which offers to lose weight quickly. Should there be any research about the effectiveness of the product, they’re usually done by the maker, there actually is no unbiased proof. These quick-fix product claims will also be peppered with medical jargon to further fool the customer. The short of it is, we should not let these businesses manipulate us.
One year it is an excessive amount of sugar while the next concentrates on the dangers of too many carbs, however there isn’t think about blame for being overweight or unhealthy otherwise. Typically, it is a mixture of products and lack of exercise. So the next time we hear about how everything fat may be the culprit, we need to let that go in one ear and out the other for the most part. Yes, an excessive amount of fat in our weight loss program is unhealthy, however it won’t be the only reason behind putting on weight.
If it may sound too good, it probably is. Research and focus what the science is behind any too-good-to-be-true claims.
Though many people want the solutions to be simple and white or black, the fact is that most science is very complicated as well as analytical thinking and digging in order to understand it. Anything that appears like her be-all-end-all answer that is so simple it seems silly probably is not trustworthy or might be flat out wrong.
We should also be cautious about any recommendations that come from just a single study. Scientific method demands more than one study. Because the Tufts piece points out, “The point, says [Assistant Professor Diane] McKay, is that with any nutrition study, you need to take a look at how it fits in with everything else else that has been found to date.” We must compare findings and comprehend the problem, not just the new and new one.
If a nutrition statement that seems too best to be true, too simplistic or claims to be considered a quick fix catches our eye, we ought to definitely check out what reputable scientific organizations have to say about things. This is a list of quality government agencies and nutrition organizations:
? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
? Food and Drug Administration
? Usa Department of Agriculture
? National Institutes of Health
? Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
? American Heart Association
? American Institute for Cancer Research
Any statements refuted by these organizations are suspect.
These lists are problematic because foods aren’t great or all bad. Balance and moderation are necessary. A candy bar on rare occasion isn’t terrible just as a little frozen treats will not kill a person. The key, though, is restraint, moderation, and balance. Indulge occasionally, but be sure to maintain a healthy diet, well-balanced meals regularly.
Tufts puts it best here: “If the article you’re reading conveniently ends with a sales hype for any supplement, or if all the studies referenced after an eating plan book are by the pack leader who wrote it, your quackery alarm should go off.” This doesn’t automatically mean the recommendations or studies are wrong, however it does mean that people ought to be cautious and research deeper.
In science, peer review is necessary for reliability and accuracy. Outside peer reviewers make sure that research is honest, has well-conducted research and credible findings, and that the research and findings are significant.
Nutrition is not a “one size fit all” science. Nutrition is individual, so any study claiming all or nothing or making blanket statements is probably not reliable.
With all the nutrition studies, facts, and information, it is good to have some guidance on things to believe, things to research further, and just what to become suspect of.
